2008年2月20日 星期三

[Program Fitting]KFBS v. McCombs - Which rep is better?

http://forums.businessweek.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=74457.4&webtag=bw-bschools
Q:
They go head to head in rankings, but in the real world who has the better national rep and for financial services, which will get me the better job?

A:
It depends on your career path. Both schools are well-rounded in general management, while McCombs is superior in accounting and KF is particularly strong in marketing management.
McCombs is now heading toward general management field and had pretty good improvement in marketing, but it's core competence remains in accounting.

KF emphasizes on teamwork with strong team building practices and collaborative culture that invites your family and friends to join KF community.

Since these 2 schools are pretty close in rankings, what really matters is not the rankings anymore but the detail curricula. When you see the finance concentrations under both mba programs, neither of them are strong in this field. McCombs is very generic that hits on fundamental theories and overall strategy like risk, investment approaches, real estate, and portfolio management. KF also have those courses and knocks a bit more detailed like derivatives, modeling, M&A, and private equity. But compare to those core finance schools, these 2 are in minor side.

Both schools are nationally competitive but have totally different positioning and core strengths. It depends on your own career goals. And no one can guarentee you a job. Only your own passion and capabilities can.

沒有留言:

張貼留言